bbs.bunglefever.com

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBv_vZZMTtM

WANT

Best Start Wreck episode:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Khrpy4V0-U4

i gotta say, i saw the trailer for this at watchmen
and it looks pretty bad ass

In the trailer, does it give anyone else the irits that the Enterprise is being built on Earth? It's just fucken wrong.

This point may have been raised in one of Mobius's many walls of text, and if so, I apologise.

I did not know this, but now that I do, I'm not surprised. Of course, being the original Enterprise, it would have been constructed on at Earth Station McKinley in Earth's orbit, if we were in the 24th century of course, Federation vessels are commissioned from the Utopia Planetia shipyards.

I've never trusted these large ships that can land on terrestrial surfaces (Voyager for instance). They'd rip shit up horribly, even at 1/4 impulse.

*napalms Melbourne*

*takes a dump in your nether regions*

Mobiesque wrote:*continues to fantasise*

*releases hounds*

Well if you don't want to make hot brown hate with me you just need to say.

Mobiesque wrote:I did not know this, but now that I do, I'm not surprised. Of course, being the original Enterprise, it would have been constructed on at Earth Station McKinley in Earth's orbit, if we were in the 24th century of course, Federation vessels are commissioned from the Utopia Planetia shipyards.

I've never trusted these large ships that can land on terrestrial surfaces (Voyager for instance). They'd rip shit up horribly, even at 1/4 impulse.

Post of the year, that man.

Well thank you.

I think between me and touchy we've got the bunglefever Star Trek Brainstrust sorted....


...Well it's no less useless than most of the shit here!

i still am NOT seeing this movie, no way no how

Stay strong.

I'm here for you.

touchy feely wrote:i still am NOT seeing this movie, no way no how

Yeah, Abrams can eat a bag of dicks.

no!

Just saw the trailer..
Looks better than any other star trek related noncery by a mile..
I'll see it...

Busta wrote:noncery

this word appeals to me.
please elaborate.

i read that there is a black hole or some paralel universe disclaimer at the begining of the film to acount for all the discrepicys from the original story .
my hunch is this is not going to do very well with the hardcore trekkies , but they will prolly pick up some noobs to the family . the whole thing just reeked of sell out the frachise , reinvent it for a new generation = fail .
i dont think we will see another phenomenon like the star wars movies in our lifetime . not that i am a huge fan , i am just saying the impact they had .

fake trailer alert :

http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/06b666 ... er-trailer

also i heard tom hanks is getting 50 million for the sequel to da da vinci code . its called illuminoti or angels and demons or some shit . 50 million !

ReverseEngineer wrote:

Busta wrote:noncery

this word appeals to me.
please elaborate.

Nonce = sex offender, particularly one who buggars little boys. A poofter. Apparently comes from underworld terminology where someone got up to "nonsense with children".

General Tso s Chicken wrote:i read that there is a black hole or some paralel universe disclaimer at the begining of the film to acount for all the discrepicys from the original story .
my hunch is this is not going to do very well with the hardcore trekkies , but they will prolly pick up some noobs to the family . the whole thing just reeked of sell out the frachise , reinvent it for a new generation = fail .

Well, the reviews are overwhelmingly positive.. So it's hardly a fail now is it?

this movie can promptly fuck off

i'm going to go see it
i've never watched an episode of star trek in my life
so i will enjoy this film


*waves to touchy*

disappointed trekkies

"I'd go watch sports"

i watched it.
i enjoyed it.

i expected sulu to say something like "we are not slow"